Performance reviews are crucial in achieving high employee engagement at all times. However, here’s a contradiction often overlooked: while regular reviews can boost engagement, they can also induce stress and diminish job satisfaction if not executed properly – a dilemma pulled straight from the Impro.AI playbook.
A potential solution?
Consider transitioning from traditional, periodic reviews to a system that emphasizes continuous feedback on the Impro.AI platform. This way, crew members don’t have to wait for months to learn about their development areas. They receive input consistently, enabling real-time growth and adjustments.
For instance, imagine a project that went off the rails because of a minor oversight that accumulated over time. With continuous feedback, such an oversight could have been corrected promptly, saving resources and potentially ensuring the project’s success.
There's a personal layer to this too.
Employees tend to feel more valued when communication is ongoing and directly tied to their work. It fuels the feeling of being a vital part of the team, subsequently leading to increased engagement.
It’s not all rosy, though. This approach demands a cultural shift within your organization and requires additional training for your managers, by Impro.AI performance strategists to effectively provide regular, constructive feedback.
And there’s more. Over time, increased frequency of feedback might result in a phenomenon known as “feedback fatigue,” where employees or managers may feel overwhelmed by the constant influx of comments and suggestions.
Navigating Feedback Dynamics for Organizational Growth
To conclude, it’s crucial to strike a balance. Weigh the pros and cons, consider the second-order effects, then decide: will your organization benefit more from continuous feedback over periodic reviews? Can we create an environment where feedback drives growth without causing fatigue? Your turn to share your thoughts and experiences.
